Sunday, December 14, 2008

Is there a Santa Claus? - a physicist view

(Yes - I realize this is quite old, but it still cracks e up. Something about the line "Santa, meanwhile, will be subjected to centrifugal forces 17,500.06 times greater than gravity." just makes me giggle.)



Consider the following:

  1. No known species of reindeer can fly. But there are 300,000 species of living organisms yet to be classified, and while most of these are insects and germs, this does not COMPLETELY rule out flying reindeer which only Santa has ever seen.
  2. There are 2 billion children (persons under 18) in the world. BUT since Santa doesn't (appear) to handle the Muslim, Hindu, Jewish and Buddhist children, that reduces the workload to 15% of the total - 378 million according to Population Reference Bureau. At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per household, that's 91.8 million homes. One presumes there's at least one good child in each.
  3. Santa has 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical).

    This works out to 822.6 visits per second. This is to say that for each Christian household with good children, Santa has 1/1000th of a second to park, hop out of the sleigh, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left, get back up the chimney, get back into the sleigh and move on to the next house.

    Assuming that each of these 91.8 million stops are evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false but for the purposes of our calculations we will accept), we are now talking about .78 miles per household, a total trip of 75-1/2 million miles, not counting stops to do what most of us must do at least once every 31 hours, plus feeding and etc.

    This means that Santa's sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second, 3,000 times the speed of sound. For purposes of comparison, the fastest man- made vehicle on earth, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second - a conventional reindeer can run, tops, 15 miles per hour.
  4. The payload on the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium-sized lego set (2 pounds), the sleigh is carrying 321,300 tons, not counting Santa, who is invariably described as overweight.

    On land, conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting that 'flying reindeer' (see point #1) could pull TEN TIMES the normal amount, we cannot do the job with eight, or even nine.

    We need 214,200 reindeer. This increases the payload - not even counting the weight of the sleigh - to 353,430 tons. Again, for comparison - this is four times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth.
  5. 353,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air resistance - this will heat the reindeer up in the same fashion as spacecraft re-entering the earth's atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer will absorb 14.3 QUINTILLION joules of energy. Per second. Each.

    In short, they will burst into flame almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them, and create deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team will be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a second.

    Santa, meanwhile, will be subjected to centrifugal forces 17,500.06 times greater than gravity. A 250-pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of his sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force.

    In conclusion - If Santa ever DID deliver presents on Christmas Eve, he's dead now.

(NOTE: This appeared in the SPY Magazine, January, 1990)


Found at http://www.physlink.com/Fun/IsThereSanta.cfm but is widespread.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Worst...er....Best Commercial Ever


Least Effective Ad Ever -- powered by Cracked.com

Friday, October 17, 2008

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Lively First Impressions



Well, after months of waiting, wondering if it was a mere rumor....Google has finally launched their long-awaited "Second Life killer" - Lively. Perhaps my expectations were too great....maybe it will improve or morph into something more substantial in the future. At the moment I find it to be uninspiring and lacking in a number of major ways. To be fair, it is still in beta - and it obviously wasn't really ever intended to be a "Second Life killer" as the press proclaimed. In a nutshell, my biggest, most-immediate dislikes:
  • Limited looks, wardrobes and objects in general (no user-created content) - to be fair, this will keep the place from becoming a gaudy hodge-podge of user-contributed crap like much of SL is, but it really takes a lot away from self-expression and the feeling of immersion, imho. As much as I hate fugly, amateurish builds in SL they do make me feel like there is a person behind it, an owner... so far Lively feels more like pre-packaged software, or maybe some small Flash-based game that you can burn 15 minutes on before getting bored. I just expected something much bigger, more grandiose from Google I guess.
  • Cartoonish avatars - I don't think avatar sex is going to be a problem to keep at bay with these avatars.
  • Not a "world"... just lots of rooms - when I first started SL, the thing I found captivating was exploring, and the feeling of being in a huge environment that was really inhabited (although most of the places I visited were empty in those days), and the possibility of stumbling upon some thing incredible or unexpected was always there. I don't get that feeling at all with Lively.
  • Poor profile tools - since Lively really works best imho as a 3D chat application, then chatting with people is the main objective I would assume. But when I look at another user in Lively, I don't get much information at all, nothign to tell me who that person is (which is important since the ability to self-express via clothing/skin/shape is limited at best). Granted, a link to a Myspace page or another website could yield the most fabulous, creative profile information imaginable - but it is still nice to have a profile within the app itself. The more you depend on outside services/sites, the less cohesive the virtual world seems. I don't suppose this is a problem if 3D chat is really the ultimate goal however. I think integrating with external services is great, and if its done in a way that keeps the focus and mind in the 3D world, it can be a tremendous addition. Since this is Google - those who brought Ajax to the unwashed masses - I fully expect them to bring more things into the Lively world down the road via API's and web services, etc. Lots of potential value there if done right.

Ultimately, Lively really seems like a 3D chat application to me - not a virtual world. As a 3D chat app I think it is probably outstanding, and the ability to embed rooms in various third-party social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, etc. is sure to mean widespread adoption. In the end, however, I just can't imagine people developing the the kind of emotional attachment to Lively that occurs for SL - an attachment that, despite all its shortcomings (and they are many) keeps people logged in for hours on end investing insane amounts of time and effort cultivating a space for themselves in another world.

I created a room in Lively to try out the tools, and in the hopes that eventually I will find it more appealing: http://www.lively.com/dr?rid=-8735996158816019028

Monday, June 16, 2008

Finally back to Flickr...

Ok, I've been consumed with RL lately and have neglected most everything...even things I enjoy and that bring me a modicum of tranquility. So, I finally had a few moments while my DSL was erroneously de-activated (thanks AT&T -.-) to do a little work on some images I had taken a while back.

http://flickr.com/photos/rivergray/

Nothing really new here, because I've been in-world so little lately I never have a chance to explore or take pics. Anyway, these are not spectacular, but they brought me some joy in their making and help to document a part of my life that otherwise will exist only in the memories of those who shared in it.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Magical Face

I don't know how I found this girl's stream, but I was so taken by her that I felt compelled to share :) She is incredibly beautiful, but more than that there is just an energy that comes through in her pics that is irresistable.


http://www.flickr.com/photos/soraya_marx/

Monday, April 21, 2008

Flashdance Reloaded


A good friend of mine, Faint Paulse, has recently begun producing some SL machinima. Not one to do anything halfway, she has turned out two of the cooler short machinima clips I've seen from SL. Her latest is her own take on the 80's classic Flashdance.


Once you've seen that, check out her other clip - a really cool SL-ification of the Brady Bunch intro.

Saturday, April 5, 2008

Chouchou!

Ok, I know I am lame and perpetually behind the times, but better late than never. I have just discovered Chouchou, and am so fucking happy I did!!! My new favorite song in the world is "Coma"....I have no words to describe how beautiful it is. Check it out.

Wow....the video is simply stunning...a visual massage. But the music is speaking directly to my soul. It is meloncholy, hopeful, dreamy and etherial yet at times hits me right in the chest and leaves me with chills, almost tearful. For the first time in soooo very long I feel inspired to create; to write some music, fiction, paint....anything.

I really don't think this hyperbole, I think this is genuinely transcendent music, enhanced additionally with the artist's aesthetic visions via Second Life and video. It is a very very cool thing indeed.

-River

Wednesday, April 2, 2008


Happy Birthday to Me.

Sunday, March 2, 2008

OMG =0.o=

I have nothing to add...

The only thing missing is a naked n00b

Thanks Faint for this hilarious Video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flkgNn50k14